• deaf_fish@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    I don’t think it does.

    Don’t get me wrong. I know people who want to believe voting is all that is necessary for progressive change, but they are wrong.

    Edit: How does voting for the lesser evil suggest that it’s sufficient for progressive change?

    • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      How does voting for the lesser evil suggest that it’s sufficient for progressive change?

      I said advocatingy for voting…

      • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Ok how does advocating for voting for the lesser evil suggest that voting for the lesser evil is sufficient for progressive change? Is that better?

        • Prunebutt@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          It suggests that people need to vote for progressive change and that congludes their options to enact power on the system.

          • deaf_fish@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yeah, that makes some sense. But you could just tell people that voting for the lesser evil alone is not enough, you also need to organize. I feel like that is pretty clear. That way you can have your cake and eat it too.