Or: We’re using math to summarise what the experiments have said so far. And then using that to extrapolate what might happen in the next experiment.
Or: We’re using math to summarise what the experiments have said so far. And then using that to extrapolate what might happen in the next experiment.
I would argue that physics is based more on experiments than math.
Was the same with the first Hitman
Plenty of physics sub-fields are still led by experiments, such as condensed matter physics. I don’t know if your statement applies to anything other than particle physics?