isn’t this prone to a
|| rm -rf /
or something similar at the end of the URL?
if you can docker exec
, you have a lot of privileges already, so be sure to make sure this is not a danger
isn’t this prone to a
|| rm -rf /
or something similar at the end of the URL?
if you can docker exec
, you have a lot of privileges already, so be sure to make sure this is not a danger
one more thing I remembered when re-reading the title: I think you can send messages to the VM using the qm command. it stands for qemu monitor, basically its a management tool
my solution to this is to only deal with the UPS in proxmox. it shuts down everything if the battery goes below a certain level.
I think you can configure nut to run a few scripts when something changes around the UPS. you could have a script that sends an alert through ntfy, and/or the web services that you want to use for this, but I’m not familiar with the notification system of nextcloud and truenas
would running nut-monitor in the VMs fit your use case?
only if that feature wouldn’t have a massive memory leak… can’t update even to 10.9 because it crashes the whole system the first time it tries to rescan a library.
there’s an issue, and they have a hard time figuring out the problem.
you should be able to turn it up always, to some extent. it’s in the settings on web
I have recently discovered what was causing this to me for years. It was IP specific port bindings. Ports of a few containers were only bound for the LAN IP of the system, but if DHCP couldn’t obtain an IP until the Docker service started its startup, then those containers couldn’t be started at all, and Docker in it’s wisdom won’t bother with retrying.
The reasons to move my compose stacks to separate systemd services are counting.
scraping bots are expected to visit it, nowadays more than in previous years. a few of them are search engines, but there’s a lot of scraping for AI training, both on text and image data.