minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mltoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.ml•Blur's "Boys And Girls" logic in Prolog.linkfedilinkarrow-up2·2 days agohttps://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/doc_for?object=%23>%3D+%2F+2 It’s a better replacement for the built-in >= predicate. linkfedilink
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mltoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.ml•Evil Oneslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down1·20 days agoYeah, you would get a runtime error calling that member without checking that it exists. linkfedilink
minus-squarepooberbee (they/she)@lemmy.mltoProgrammer Humor@lemmy.ml•Evil Oneslinkfedilinkarrow-up26arrow-down2·21 days agoJavascript and not Coq? linkfedilink
https://www.swi-prolog.org/pldoc/doc_for?object=%23>%3D+%2F+2
It’s a better replacement for the built-in
>=
predicate.